Player 4 has the priority deal and buys 1 Green Cargo share for 90 Mkr.
Player 1 adds to the competition on the board by starting Blå Tåget with a par price of 100 Mkr
and takes the President certificate for 200 Mkr. Player 2 and 3 have more confidence in Green
Cargo while Player 4, expecting more bidding for line contracts, switches to buying 1 Banverket share
for 65 Mkr. Player 1 buys a 2nd Blå Tåget share and player 2 buys the last Green Cargo share. Player 3
follows player 4's example and buys 1 Banverket share. Player 4 starts buying Blå Tåget shares
and Player 1 buys 1 SJ share after which player 2 and 3 buy the last Banverket shares. Player 4 buys a 2nd Blå Tåget share, after which
player 1 has to pass. Player 2, 3 and 4 buy Blå Tåget shares to float the company and after yet a pass
by player 1, player 2 buys the last Veolia share. Player 3 can only afford an SJ share, after which all
players pass and player 4 keeps the priority deal. The shares for Arriva, Veolia, Green Cargo and Banverket
are sold out so the stock prices increase.
Player 1 again collects 35 Mkr from Connex and 50 Mkr from A-Train.
while player 2 collects 55 Mkr from Svedab.
Player 3 collects 25 Mkr from BK Tåg and player 4 collects 25 Mkr from TÅGAB and 50 Mkr from Malmbanan.
Veolia runs Stockholm-Norrköping-Linköping-Nässjö-Hässleholm-Malmö as before
(70+20+40+20+20+50) and still with no contacts to cover the fee of 40 Mkr.
The revenue of 180 Mkr is paid as dividends, increasing the share value to 142.
Veolia also surprises the other players by buying the two last 3-trains.
Green Cargo and the newly floated Blå Tåget share the same stock grid box (value 100) but Blå Tåget
moved there first and operates before Green Cargo. The president, player 1, now executes their plan and
buy the two first 4-trains, triggering the start of phase 4 and the discard of all 2-trains. Blå Tåget
also adds 40 Mkr to the lobby board.
Green Cargo loses one 2-train and, unable to operate all its lines, returns the Mittbanan contract and
loses the bid of 20 Mkr. With its remaining two 3-trains, it manages to operate Narvik-Gällivare-Östersund
and Gällivare-Boden-Luleå-Umeå, earning 30+40+30+20+40 for Botniabanan and 40+40 for Inlandsbanan plus
another 30 Mkr for the 6 cities <50. Less the operating fees of 20 Mkr and 10 Mkr (of which 20 Mkr are
paid from Contacts), they still manage to pay 260 Mkr in dividends and buy a 4-train but chooses not to
add any money to the lobby board. The share value increases to 112.
Arriva is less fortunate with only one 3-train left so they decide to return both Mälarbanan and Västra
stambanan and focus on Västkustbanan. The company gets 140 Mkr and cover the contract fee with 30 Mkr of the 40
Mkr in Contacts. No money is added to the lobby board, nor are any dividends paid, so the share price goes back to 82.
SJ has 85 Mkr in the Treasury and a revenue of 110 Mkr. Add to this 0+25+20 for the returned contracts
Mittbanan, Mälarbanan and Västra stambanan and they manage to pay dividends of 240 Mkr, increasing
the share value to 65.
Banverket has 75 Mkr in Treasury and gets 40+40+30+20+40 Mkr from line contract fees and another
20+40+40 Mkr from SJ's line contracts.
The cost is 85 Mkr, leaving 190 Mkr for dividends.
The share value increases to 71.
No private companies want to lobby due to the upcoming auctions
so Banverket and SJ start closing Sydostlänken by closing the tracks
Västervik-Kalmar-Karlshamn. This decreases Banverket's cost with 10 Mkr (2 closed tracks) and increases SJ's revenue with
5 Mkr (the 10-city Kalmar disconnnected).
Finally, since a new phase has started, all line contracts are auctioned. The private companies continue
their non-competitive bidding agreement and get their contracts for the minimum bid. Blå Tåget takes over
Mälarbanan and Västra stambanan and Green Cargo takes back Mittbanan while Veolia keeps Södra stambanan and
Arriva Västkustbanan.
This "stress test" showed a slight imbalance as the the higher risk of the private companies didn't quite
pay off compared to the lower risk of the state companies. The main reason was the bank pool dividends.
While the private companies keep the money within the company, the state companies pay them as dividends the
next round. Thus, the fewer the shareholders, the better the dividends. This could be considered a feature
as this "prisoners' dilemma" mechanic will make it bad for all players to keep their state shares and
dilute the dividends. On the other hand, it didn't make sense that a single shareholder would be better off
with one share than all ten shares. Since the spreadsheet showed that the state companies had a
reasonable revenue progress, a new game test where the bank pool dividends were
kept by the Bank was started.